Saturday, October 11, 2025

Retrospect: Hellraiser (2022)

I recently did a rewatch of the Hellraiser franchise, or at least the ones that matter most aka the ones that received a theatrical release. and after rewatching films 1 - 4 it only felt appropriate to revisit the 2022 remake since I had only seen it once during its initial release. So what’s the verdict? Weeeell, It’s not a bad film but I do have mixed feelings about it. there are things I really liked, things I didn’t. And then things I flat out loathed. So I will break down some of these pros and cons into three categories: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly Truth.

THE GOOD: first off I’ll start with the good. the cinematography is well done here. This is probably the best a Hellraiser movie has looked in years. Probably the best looking one since the first and second films. And I say this not to knock down the classics by any means. The original is even by today’s standards a masterclass in practical effects done so well that they stand the test of time nearly 40 years later! And almost the same can be said about its sequel “Hellbound: Hellraiser II”. However the third and fourth installments (Hell on Earth, Bloodline) began dabbling into CGI effects that, unfortunately were still very much in their infancy stage in the early to mid 90’s and sadly looked quite dated just a couple of years later when films like The Matrix smashed on to theater screens globally. But I digress, the remake is beautifully shot. There is an eeriness that weigh heavy over the film scene for scene and I can appreciate the unsettling sensation it gives off, it’s very on brand with the franchise. I also liked the new lore introduced for the puzzle box. With the ritual mechanic. It brings a new level of wickedness to the lament configuration that feels fresh and more consequential. There’s a new sense of risk introduced here especially when the puzzle solver must forcibly feed the box sacrifices in order to complete it’s transformation to gain an audience with it’s god Leviathan and receive your “reward” in the form of one of six choices: Lament ("Life"), Lore ("Knowledge"), Laudarant ("Love"), Liminal ("Sensation"), Lazarus ("Resurrection"), and Leviathan ("Power"). Regardless of your desire the choice you make is not so simple. Everything has a price to pay, a consequence to balance the scale whether it be for love, power, or the pursuit of knowledge. What you seek you will get.. and much more than you bargained for. 

THE BAD: now on to the bad. First off I want to say I respect and appreciate a different take on the Cenobites overall design. It’s both ambitious and risky at best, and sometimes in remakes it works well, sometimes it doesn’t. Unfortunately it mostly doesn’t here. It feels soulless and lacking personality in my opinion. and just feels very… plastic-like. The original’s design was practical with its BDSM black leather and blood. It manages to pull off a sense of order and cleanliness with a dash of grotesque. It’s effective with less. The new designs are in my opinion, too loud without saying a whole lot. On paper the idea that their outfits are literally made of their skin sounds interesting, but in practice it doesn’t work. It comes off more as an eye sore than anything, and quite frankly it’s distracting. I will, however give credit where credit is due and say I enjoyed Jamie Clayton’s interpretation of Pinhead as it took inspiration and honors both Barker’s original novella, and the 2011 follow up comic series also co-written by Barker himself called “Clive Barker’s Hellraiser” by BOOM! Comics, in which Kristy Cotton inherits the role of the hell priestess and donned an all white attire. I liked that Clayton’s interpretation barrows from these two sources while also being original. I only wish I could say the same for the rest of the gash.

THE UGLY TRUTH: and now the ugly truth… I’m going to be frank here (see what I did there?). What makes the early Hellraiser films work are its lead non-cenobite characters that do the heavy lifting when Doug Bradley’s Pinhead isn’t on screen. From Kristy Cotton (Ashley Laurence), Julia (Clare Higgins), Frank (Sean Chapman), Tiffany (Imogen Boorman), Joey (Terry Farrell), to the Toymaker (Bruce Ramsay). These characters breathe so much personality into the films and are really its heart. Without them these films would be missing a crucial component. Sadly I cannot say the same for the remake’s band of characters. None of them are really likable in my opinion. And this isn’t an attack on the actors themselves. I personally enjoyed Odessa A'zion in the movie Until Dawn (2025), and thought she did a great job here as well. But I really didn’t care for her character Riley, or her brother, or friends. There wasn’t much effort put into their character development. It’s not a skill issue with the cast but rather the writing. And that’s the major issue with the 2022 remake. It suffers from a weak script that has too much runtime on its hands and not enough happening in it. By the time things really do start to kick off it’s too little, too late. I also did not care a whole lot for the film’s main antagonist Roland Voight played by Goran Višnjić. The character felt too generic and forgettable. Especially when you take into consideration Voight’s motivations and goals weren’t much different from Frank’s in the sense that his pursuit for new pleasures knew no bounds. But at least with Frank there was a level of scum just under the surface that leaves a lasting impression. Jamie Clayton’s performance as the iconic Pinhead was great with what she was given. She’s no Doug Bradley, nor does she attempt to try but rather do her own thing which I can respect. But once again the weak script left so much to be desired for what could have been.
 
All in all. The 2022 remake is by no means a terrible film. But it’s pretty generic and unimaginative. If there is a future for this remake I certainly hope the filmmakers are taking notes and learn from their mistakes because with a better script, and some adjustments to the cenobite design this new chapter of the franchise could have a bright future ahead.

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Review: Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025)

Review: Honestly wasn’t sure how I would feel about First Steps going in because the Fantastic Four is a hero team that has been plagued with subpar adaptations for the past 30 years. The closes we got to something remotely close to being accurate was the unreleased 90s adaptation and that was pretty rough even by the 90s standards. The 00s films were fun for what they were but wasn’t exactly the embodiment of Marvel’s first family. And I don’t want to even speak of the 2015 Josh Trank disaster Fant4stick because even if it wasn’t all Trank’s fault, it’s clear that everyone in charge of making that film clearly didn’t understand the characters or the source material. 


That being said, the 2025 reboot starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Julia Garner and Ralph Ineson brings us a more faithful take on the Iconic characters in a universe (Earth-828) that is more akin to the era the characters were created in with a story that is more rooted in the family dynamics. Similarly to James Gunn’s Superman (2025) First Steps doesn’t waste any time with an origins story or a retelling. It throws you right into the middle of it all but gives you just enough for you to get the gist of it all without boring you with rethreading the same patterns over and over again. The best part is, in my opinion is seeing a version of Galactus that feels like it’s straight out of the pages of the comic. Ralph Ineson Captures the attitude and mannerisms of the Devourer of Worlds so perfectly that I don’t think anyone else could have done a better job. The stakes feel high, the threat real, and my boy Galactus has never looked so incredibly badass.


I honestly had my doubts on whether or not Pedro Pascal was up to the task to play Mr. Fantastic himself, but I stand corrected. He acts like the calculating scientist Reed is known to be from the comics and I’m glad that my doubts about him were wrong. Alongside co-star Vanessa Kirby’s Sue Storm the pair have onscreen chemistry that feels genuine, and they feel like a perfect balance of Yin and Yang. Whereas Reed is the team leader who must think of the plans and scenarios using logic, Sue is very much the heart and conscience of the team. She is their diplomats who maintains the peace and really means on each other for support. Joseph Quinn did a fairly good job as Johnny Storm. His take on the character is less of a smart mouthing hot headed jokester and more matured and understanding. This isn’t to say he isn’t fun like previous adaptations, but this Johnny has clearly done sone growing up since becoming the Human Torch, and to be frank it’s a nice change up on the character which shows growth and development. Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s take on Ben Grimm was pretty solid, although I would be lying if I said I wasn’t missing Michael Chiklis more raspy sounding voice which in my opinion matched The Thing more. But it’s not a huge deal breaker in my opinion as Bachrach’s take is still very much likable. My only disappointment is I feel like we didn’t get enough of Ben in the film and at times he was sidelined for other character’s growth. 


Finally, Julia Garner. Her casting as the titular Herald of Galactus drummed up a lot of controversy early on into production most notably by people who either weren't very familiar with the character or the lore. Or was afraid of another “M-She-U” girl boss trope. Garner’s Shalla-Bal was actually pretty amazing and relatable. She doesn’t feel shoehorned in or like a trope and feels very comic-accurate. There’s a chase scene towards the film’s second act involving the Surfer that had me on the edge of my seat. Her character was utilized much better here than her male counterpart Norrin Radd was in the 2007’s F4 movie Rise of the Silver Surfer in my opinion. I only wish we had gotten a bit more of her backstory laid out here and maybe a bit more time. Which is a semi issue the movie does have, and it’s we don’t get a whole lot of time with the villains of the story. I would have preferred more screen time on Galactus and Shalla-Bal. But I’m sure this is because we are likely to get Norrin Radd as some point later down the road. 


Final Verdict: I had somewhat higher expectations going into First Steps than I did with DC’s Superman, but similarly to Superman I came out satisfied with expectations blown clear out of the water. And the mid-credit scene in my opinion is the chef’s kiss that sets up what’s to come next (you’ll know when you see it). 


Rating: 9/10

Review: Superman (2025)


Review: Although It starts off a bit messy and quite bloated. Also something that happens towards the second act that is totally lore breaking for the Superman mythos, I won’t go into detail because it’s a spoiler, but you’ll know it when you see it.. eventually it becomes the type of Superman movie we have waited years to arrive full of truth, Justice, and above all hope. Krypto is also a major scene stealer throughout. His relationship with Clark is complicated and at times chaotic, but as someone who’s owned many dogs through the decades I can relate to Clark’s relationship with Krypto. Haha! 


The cinematography is beautifully shot here. So many scenes feel like something straight out of a comic book. Long gone are the doom and gloom palette of the DCEU. Gunn fully embraces a bright and hopeful world full with an array of color. The choice in soundtrack is a bit of an interesting choice for a Superman film but something that is totally within James Gunn’s wheelhouse as a filmmaker. 

As far as I can tell there were no miscasts here. If you’re going in expecting another Henry Cavill archetype you will be sadly mistaken. But that’s not entirely a bad thing here. Whereas the Snyderverse Superman of yesteryear marveled moviegoers with a display of incredible strength and near invincibility, David Corenswet‘s Kal-El is flawed. He’s vulnerable, he messes up, and at times a bit naive. But he also inspires hope and determination to do the right thing even when it’s the most difficult. It’s clear as day that Corenswet drew inspiration from Smallville star Tom Welling’s take on the character as there are moments in the film when it feels like I’m seeing Welling rather than Corenswet in the suit. Nicholas Hoult Is listed as the film’s highest paid actor in the cast and to be frank, he’s worth every penny here. Hoult gives us one of the most vicious, and pettiest incarnations of Lex Luthor on the big screen. Calling his version of Lex obsessive would be making light of it. He lives and breathes solely to end Superman in every single aspect. And here Hoult excels beyond expectations. Rachel Brosnahan‘s version of Lois Lane feels like a hybrid of classic meets modern. Prior to seeing the film I wasn’t so sure where I stood on the casting choice of Edi Gathegi as Mister Terrific, but I can honestly say he shined bright light a Dimond in the role especially alongside his fellow “Justice Gang” teammates played by Nathan Fillion (Guy Gardner Green Lantern) and Isabela Merced (Hawkgirl). As a trio they play off each other in a fluid and charismatic way. I honestly cannot wait to see more of them in future appearances. 


Final Verdict: James Gunn’s rebooted Superman isn’t a perfect film. It’s messy and disorganized. But it also feels right. It feels like the kind of thing we need right now. 


Rating: 9/10